Dabble reviews full#

That was CANpletely & totally unexpected. Finish had a surprising return of coconut dominance! Wow. That is why, when the used to make them, I always set aside the coconut ones in a roll of Tropical Fruit Life Savers - all of the other flavors (mango, tangerine, pineapple, guava, passion fruit) went well together, but coconut was to be savored all by itself. It had an amalgam of tropical fruit flavors, but I just felt that the citrusy flavors were not meshing well with the aforementioned coconut. The taste was not as pleasant as on the nose. Color was a downright cloudy solid-Amber (SRM = > 7, < 9). I made some casseroles that were really tasty & the kitchen smelled much like this beer! Yum. I used to put dried, shredded coconut into a LOT of baked dishes before baking them in the oven & not just desserts. Nose was redolent with coconut! 8=O I love coconut, although I know that not everyone does.

It puffed up mightily to form just over two fingers of dense, foamy, rocky, tawny head with great retention. 8=( Once the vent was vented, I wented with a slow, gentle C-Line Glug into the awaiting glass. I love Crack!ing open a new Slimline CAN! This was to have been the wave of the future, taken from Red Bull, but it just did not catch on. Sabro provides an incredible coconut note, Cashmere brings a soft, delicate complexity, and Idaho 7 brings potency and depth.

Dabble reviews full#

The new hop blend blew our minds, so for DABBLE, we’re taking our experiment full scale with massive loads of hops so everyone can experience it. To truly harness these new flavors though, you’ve got to dabble a bit and test them out. Hop farmers are breeding insane new flavors-one sip and you’ll be hooked. Even better, this is from a Slimline CAN in support of The CANQuest (tm)!įrom the CAN: 'There’s nothing quite like your first taste.

Feature-rich interface that includes the ability to highlight, add notes, include images, etc.Today is the ocCANsion of Sixpoint Me the Way to New Beer Sunday (Week 749) & this shall be the first of my triumphal return, having been forced to sit out last week.

Allows you to work in the browser, the desktop app, or the mobile app - they all sync together through the Cloud the next time there’s internet.

Ability to export your work into either a Word (.DOC) or text (.TXT) file.

Simply and intuitive word count goal tracker that integrates with Nanowrimo and even lets you set days off.

Floating taskbar includes ability to bold, italicize, and quote text.

Scrivener is more cusomizable than Dabble.

Scrivener has a higher learning curve for using its feature-rich interface if you want to take advantage of all its features (however, from my experience, there are more features than you need).

Dabble is touted as “Scrivener without the learning curve”.

Dabble was designed to be a simple word processor with minimal features in which writers can write without distraction while also keeping all their work organized in one place.

Scrivener has more features than Dabble.

Word count goal settings in Dabble (Screencap taken by author) Tldr: If you wanted to add another part or chapter, you’d have to find it under the Book Actions section, which is the ⋮ beside your book’s name. This means you need to specifically click the ⋮ beside where it says MANUSCRIPT and select Add New Book. What these folders represent can be changed after they are created, but their spot in the nest hierarchy determines their subsection type.įor instance, if you wanted to add another book to your project in Dabble, you’d have to find it in the Manuscript Actions section. You have to create folders for each book subsection type in specific levels. In Dabble, the folders are preset and refer to a specific type of book section. And since you define what these folders represent, you have complete freedom to organize your work however you want within a project. You could keep nesting folders to infinity if you so chose. This means there is no limit to the number of folders you can nest within each other. You simply click the folder to name it and edit it to represent whatever subsection you want. A folder is simply an undefined text file that you can define any way you like.

In Scrivener, the folders do not inherently refer to any type of book section they are not predefined. There is a slight difference in the way you create these nested documents in both programs that could get a bit confusing. Nesting hierarchy: the books “Benny’s Story”, “Bad Blood”, “Killing Jar”, “Human Nature” > part 1 “Wanted” > chapter 1 > scene 1 (Screencap taken by author) see the screencaps from the previous section for how this looks in Scrivener